Arbitral AwardPublic PolicyContract VariationSetting Aside Award
Tags
ArbitrationPublic PolicyContract Variation
legislation
Statutes Cited
Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15]
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award is contrary to public policy of Zimbabwe","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award dismissed all variation claims and alternative claims"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator failed to determine all issues presented","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Claims for damages and unjust enrichment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether arbitrator's reasoning was outrageous in defiance of logic","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator's findings on contract variations and evidence"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Clovgate Elevator Company entered into a contract with Zimbabwe Power Corporation for lift shaft refurbishment at Kariba Power Station. Clovgate claimed the contract was varied resulting in extra expenses, but ZPC disputed this. The dispute went to arbitration before Justice Mtshiya, who ruled that all variations claimed were null and void and dismissed all claims.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases