{"issue_text":"Whether termination of probationary contract without assessment is unlawful","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No assessment conducted; employee on probation"}
{"issue_text":"Whether damages in lieu of reinstatement appropriate where position filled","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employee replaced after termination"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appeal grounds properly formulated","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Grounds 1-3 fragmented single issue"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The 2nd respondent was employed as CEO by the appellant on 1 October 2023 under a probationary contract. Her contract was terminated on 31 December 2023 for alleged unsatisfactory performance without proper assessment. She successfully claimed unlawful termination at arbitration, and the appellant appealed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases