Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Craftcall Investments (Private) Limited v Diana Mutsa Mapondera and Lawrence Masanga

HH 495-25

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
2 September 2025
Citation
HH 495-25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHH 495
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Chitapi J
Full Bench
Chitapi J
Areas of Law
Property lawContract law
Keywords
Sale agreementPower of attorneyForgerySpecific performanceProperty transfer
Tags
Property disputeSale agreementPower of attorneySpecific performance
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Regional Town and Country Planning Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the sale agreement dated 26 April 2013 is valid and binding on the first respondent","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Power of attorney post-dates agreement; first respondent denies signature"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of specific performance","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant claims full payment made; first respondent disputes receipt"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the power of attorney dated 29 May 2013 was validly executed","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"First respondent claims she was not in Karoi on that date"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant company sought an order for specific performance to compel transfer of property it claimed to have purchased from the first respondent. The sale agreement was allegedly signed by an agent under a power of attorney, which the first respondent disputed as forged.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →