{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant's cause of action is grounded in delict or contract","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Employment contracts with confidentiality clauses, alleged unlawful competition"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant established a prima facie case of unlawful competition","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged passing off, diversion of customers, use of confidential information"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the three forms of unlawful competition (passing off, leaning on, unfair use of fruits and labour) were established","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged misrepresentation, use of applicant's efforts, abuse of trade secrets"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a company specializing in electronics, solar and gas appliances, sought an interdict against its former employees (first, second and third respondents) and their newly formed company (fourth respondent) for alleged unlawful competition. The former employees were accused of using confidential information and trade secrets obtained during employment to divert customers and pass off their business as that of the applicant.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases