Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Cuthbert Chiromo v Steady Munyanyi and The Sheriff of Zimbabwe

HH 836-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
20 December 2018
Citation
HH 836-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 836
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
Manzunzu J
Full Bench
Manzunzu J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureExecution LawUrgent Applications
Keywords
ExecutionStay of executionUrgent applicationPoints in limineRule 241Form 29B
Tags
ExecutionUrgent ApplicationPoints in Limine
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Rules of the High Court
  • Rules of the High Court
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the application complied with Rule 241 requirements for form","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Use of incorrect form for chamber application"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the relief sought was competent given no pending appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appeal had been dismissed, no appeal pending"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the application was urgent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Delay in acting after receiving notice of appeal dismissal"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought to stay execution of a judgment obtained by the first respondent in case HC 5114/11. The applicant had filed an appeal (SC 458/17) which was dismissed by the Supreme Court Registrar in September 2018. When the first respondent issued a writ of execution in October 2018, the applicant brought an urgent application to stay execution pending the determination of the (non-existent) appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →