motor vehicle loan agreementcession of rightslocus standicontract interpretationsecondmenttransfer of employment
Tags
motor vehicle loancessionlocus standicontract interpretation
legislation
Statutes Cited
High Court Rules
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether plaintiff has locus standi to claim from defendant the balance due under motor vehicle loan agreement following defendant's transfer to DZL","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant's transfer to DZL, alleged cession of loan arrangement, absence of formal cession agreement"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The defendant was seconded from Dairibord Zimbabwe Limited to plaintiff as Finance Manager and Company Secretary. During secondment, parties entered motor vehicle loan agreement. When secondment was terminated and defendant recalled to DZL, he left with the vehicle still owing MK 989,355.84. Plaintiff sued for recovery. Defendant raised locus standi defence claiming cession of loan to DZL.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases