{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred by finding fault with the disciplinary hearing being conducted outside the 14-day timeframe in S.I. 15/2006","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Hearing held 29 days after suspension"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred by disregarding the audio recording evidence as inadmissible","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Audio recording made without consent; three witnesses testified"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred by finding that respondent did not fail to execute his duties","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Evidence showed respondent's involvement with illegal miners"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred by disregarding evidence of witnesses who saw respondent at milling company","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent seen collecting share of illegal mining proceeds"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent, employed as chief security officer at Dalny Mine from August 2008 to 13 August 2015, was dismissed for allegedly failing to control illegal panning and safeguard company assets. The arbitrator found the dismissal unfair and ordered reinstatement. The appellant appealed, arguing the arbitrator erred in law and fact.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases