CondonationLate filingJudicial managementService of processRule 15(6)
Tags
Judicial managementCondonationLate filingService of process
legislation
Statutes Cited
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
P
r
i
s
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
5
2
P
r
i
s
o
n
R
u
l
e
s
1
9
9
9
(
S
I
1
9
9
9
/
7
2
8
)
C
r
i
m
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
6
7
M
u
r
d
e
r
(
A
b
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
e
a
t
h
P
e
n
a
l
t
y
)
A
c
t
1
9
6
5
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
1
9
7
3
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
1
9
8
9
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
1
9
9
5
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
1
9
9
8
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
1
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
3
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
5
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
8
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
0
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
3
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
5
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
7
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
1
9
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
I
r
e
l
a
n
d
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
2
1
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant should be granted condonation for late filing of response","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"7-day delay, reasonable explanation, prospects of success"}
{"issue_text":"Whether service at Kadoma offices was proper for a company under judicial management","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Judicial manager not cited, service at Kadoma not Harare"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
David Whitehead Textiles Limited, under final judicial management, applied for condonation for late filing of its response to an application. The company received the application on 14 February 2019 but filed its response on 11 March 2019, seven days late. The delay was attributed to the failure to cite the judicial manager and service being effected at the company's Kadoma offices rather than the judicial manager's Harare address.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases