Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court
DE BURBURE (PRIVATE) LIMITED v PENIAS KAZINGIZI & 7 ORS
HH 435-2012
Case Details
Court
Harare High Court
Date
13 November 2012
Citation
HH 435-2012
Neutral Citation
[2012] ZWHH 435
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application
Bench
Presiding
BERE J
Full Bench
BERE J
Areas of Law
Property lawLand reformCivil procedure
Keywords
Land occupationUrgent applicationFarm evictionLand allocationGovernment departments
Tags
Land disputeFarm occupationUrgent applicationLand reform
legislation
Statutes Cited
- P
- r
- i
- s
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 5
- 2
- E
- u
- r
- o
- p
- e
- a
- n
- C
- o
- n
- v
- e
- n
- t
- i
- o
- n
- o
- n
- H
- u
- m
- a
- n
- R
- i
- g
- h
- t
- s
- H
- u
- m
- a
- n
- R
- i
- g
- h
- t
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 8
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 7
- 1
- N
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- l
- i
- t
- y
- ,
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- n
- d
- A
- s
- y
- l
- u
- m
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 2
- S
- p
- e
- c
- i
- a
- l
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- p
- p
- e
- a
- l
- s
- C
- o
- m
- m
- i
- s
- s
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 7
- A
- n
- t
- i
- -
- t
- e
- r
- r
- o
- r
- i
- s
- m
- ,
- C
- r
- i
- m
- e
- a
- n
- d
- S
- e
- c
- u
- r
- i
- t
- y
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 1
- R
- e
- g
- u
- l
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- o
- f
- I
- n
- v
- e
- s
- t
- i
- g
- a
- t
- o
- r
- y
- P
- o
- w
- e
- r
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 0
- P
- o
- l
- i
- c
- e
- a
- n
- d
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- E
- v
- i
- d
- e
- n
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 8
- 4
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 8
- 8
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- a
- n
- d
- P
- u
- b
- l
- i
- c
- O
- r
- d
- e
- r
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 4
- C
- r
- i
- m
- e
- (
- S
- e
- n
- t
- e
- n
- c
- e
- s
- )
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 7
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 3
- P
- o
- w
- e
- r
- s
- o
- f
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- C
- o
- u
- r
- t
- s
- (
- S
- e
- n
- t
- e
- n
- c
- i
- n
- g
- )
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 0
- C
- r
- i
- m
- e
- a
- n
- d
- D
- i
- s
- o
- r
- d
- e
- r
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 8
- C
- r
- i
- m
- i
- n
- a
- l
- E
- v
- i
- d
- e
- n
- c
- e
- (
- W
- i
- t
- n
- e
- s
- s
- A
- n
- o
- n
- y
- m
- i
- t
- y
- )
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 8
- C
- o
- r
- o
- n
- e
- r
- s
- a
- n
- d
- J
- u
- s
- t
- i
- c
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 9
- L
- e
- g
- a
- l
- A
- i
- d
- ,
- S
- e
- n
- t
- e
- n
- c
- i
- n
- g
- a
- n
- d
- P
- u
- n
- i
- s
- h
- m
- e
- n
- t
- o
- f
- O
- f
- f
- e
- n
- d
- e
- r
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 2
- S
- e
- r
- i
- o
- u
- s
- C
- r
- i
- m
- e
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 5
- C
- o
- u
- n
- t
- e
- r
- -
- T
- e
- r
- r
- o
- r
- i
- s
- m
- a
- n
- d
- S
- e
- c
- u
- r
- i
- t
- y
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 5
- I
- n
- v
- e
- s
- t
- i
- g
- a
- t
- o
- r
- y
- P
- o
- w
- e
- r
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 6
- D
- a
- t
- a
- P
- r
- o
- t
- e
- c
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 8
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- n
- d
- A
- s
- y
- l
- u
- m
- A
- c
- t
- 1
- 9
- 9
- 9
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- ,
- A
- s
- y
- l
- u
- m
- a
- n
- d
- N
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- l
- i
- t
- y
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 6
- U
- K
- B
- o
- r
- d
- e
- r
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 7
- B
- o
- r
- d
- e
- r
- s
- ,
- C
- i
- t
- i
- z
- e
- n
- s
- h
- i
- p
- a
- n
- d
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 0
- 9
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 4
- I
- m
- m
- i
- g
- r
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 1
- 6
- N
- a
- t
- i
- o
- n
- a
- l
- i
- t
- y
- a
- n
- d
- B
- o
- r
- d
- e
- r
- s
- A
- c
- t
- 2
- 0
- 2
- 2
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
- {"issue_text":"Whether this application should be treated as urgent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Delay of nearly a year in bringing application despite knowledge of occupation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought urgent relief to evict respondents who had occupied Tavydale Farm since November 2011. The respondents claimed peaceful occupation with their first harvest in 2012. The court found the application lacked urgency as the applicant delayed nearly a year before approaching the court.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →
Legal Intelligence
for Africa.
for Africa.
Zalari is Zimbabwe and Southern Africa's leading AI-powered legal research platform, built by DeepCounsel and powered by Nyamaropa Technologies. Search Zimbabwe Supreme Court and High Court case law instantly, get AI-generated answers with full source citations, and access the most comprehensive corpus of Zimbabwean and Southern African jurisprudence available online. Zalari is the go-to legal AI platform for attorneys, advocates, law students, judges, and corporate counsel across Zimbabwe and South Africa — delivering faster research, smarter insights, and a competitive edge in legal practice. Zalari does not provide legal advice. Always consult a qualified legal practitioner for advice specific to your situation. © 2026 DeepCounsel — a legal technology company democratising access to legal knowledge in Africa.