foreign currency awardsarbitral award reviewdamages quantificationZimbabwe dollar era
legislation
Statutes Cited
None identified
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Is it competent for an arbitrator to award damages in foreign currency for a claim arising during the Zimbabwe dollar era?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Claim arose 2000 under Zimbabwe dollar; Zimbabwe dollar later valueless"}
{"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator err by using Reserve Bank exchange rates without calling further evidence?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator relied on RBZ rates; parties did not testify on rate"}
{"issue_text":"Was the 3-year period for securing alternative employment reasonable?","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent initially indicated 3 months; arbitrator found 3 years reasonable given unemployment"}
{"issue_text":"Was the monthly damages award of US$552.68 justified where respondent claimed US$300?","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent claimed US$300 entitlement; arbitrator awarded US$552.68"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Employee dismissed in 2000 during Zimbabwe dollar era; arbitrator awarded damages in US dollars for 3-year period; employer appealed claiming error in foreign currency award and factual findings.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases