{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant had sexual intercourse with the complainant without her consent while she was drunk and asleep","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Complainant's alcohol consumption, her state of consciousness, medical evidence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in convicting the appellant based on findings that complainant was intoxicated and incapable of consent","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Evidence of intoxication, appellant's defense of consent"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in rejecting appellant's version of consensual sexual intercourse","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's testimony, complainant's credibility, surrounding circumstances"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant was convicted of raping a woman who was drunk and asleep at the time of sexual intercourse. He appealed against both conviction and sentence, arguing that the sexual intercourse was consensual and that the complainant was neither intoxicated nor asleep.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases