{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in awarding a 10% wage increment without considering sustainability and affordability","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Economic downturn, company closures, liquidity challenges"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator properly understood and discharged her mandate","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Mandate to determine sustainable and realistic wages"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties engaged in collective bargaining for 2014 wage increments. The union proposed 52.2% increase while employers offered 2.5% on wages only. After deadlock and failed conciliation, arbitration awarded 10% wage increment, which employers appealed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases