unfair dismissalarbitrationfixed term contractslegitimate expectationreinstatementbias
Tags
arbitration reviewfixed term contractslegitimate expectation
legislation
Statutes Cited
Model Law to the Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator committed gross irregularity by proceeding without an oral hearing when requested","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant requested oral hearing on 13 December 2012; Award issued on 14 December 2012; Parties never agreed to no oral hearing"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator exhibited bias by failing to hold an oral hearing and serving award directly on applicant","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator failed to hold oral hearing when requested; Award served directly on applicant instead of legal practitioners"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondents were employed by the appellant on fixed term contracts from October 2010, with the last contracts running from 1 March to 30 June 2012. When these contracts were not renewed, the respondents claimed unfair dismissal, alleging legitimate expectation of re-engagement. The matter proceeded to arbitration where the arbitrator ruled in favour of the respondents, ordering reinstatement and damages in lieu of reinstatement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases