section 129(1)(k)political party membershipparliamentary seat vacationconstitutional interpretation
Tags
parliamentary membershippolitical party expulsionconstitutional interpretation
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act, 2013
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Speaker's announcement that applicants' parliamentary seats became vacant violated their constitutional rights under sections 56(1), 67(3)(b), 68 and 69(3)","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Speaker's announcement following ZANU-PF notification of expulsion"}
{"issue_text":"Whether section 129(1)(k) requires the Speaker to inquire into the legality of party membership termination","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicants' claim that expulsion was unlawful"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants, former ZANU-PF Members of Parliament, challenged the Speaker's announcement that their parliamentary seats had become vacant after their party expelled them and notified the Speaker in terms of section 129(1)(k) of the Constitution. They alleged violations of their constitutional rights including equal protection, right to stand for election, administrative justice and fair hearing.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases