right of appealconstitutional court jurisdictionurgent set downSupreme Court appeal
Tags
constitutional appealright of appealurgent application
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether applicants have right of appeal to Constitutional Court from Supreme Court judgment","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No constitutional issues determined by Supreme Court; alleged violation only apparent after judgment"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicants established urgency for setting down appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Public interest argument based on job losses; no personal urgency circumstances"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants filed a notice of appeal to the Constitutional Court against a Supreme Court judgment that dismissed their appeal in a labour dispute. They sought urgent set down of the appeal, claiming constitutional violations under section 56(1) of the Constitution that only became apparent after the Supreme Court judgment.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases