dispute of interestdispute of rightlabour arbitrationNational Employment Councilunfair labour practice
Tags
arbitrationjurisdictionunfair labour practicetrade unioncollective bargaining agreement
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
Labour Act
Labour Act
Labour Act
Labour Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Did the arbitrators have jurisdiction to deal with a dispute concerning salary increments and grading systems?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The dispute involved creation of new legal rights for higher salaries and allowances"}
{"issue_text":"Was the dispute a dispute of interest or a dispute of right?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The dispute concerned creation of new legal rights rather than infringement of existing rights"}
{"issue_text":"Did section 29 of the Labour Act empower referral to arbitration?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Matter was referred in terms of section 29, not section 75"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent trade union sought to negotiate terms and conditions of employment for funeral industry workers. After unsuccessful attempts to establish a National Employment Council for the Funeral Sector, the matter was referred to arbitration. The arbitrators purported to set minimum wages and grading systems despite the appellant being regulated under an existing collective bargaining agreement (SI 45/93).
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases