Succession LawConstitutional LawAdministrative Law
Keywords
intestate successionillegitimate childrencommon lawconstitutional rightsreview of Master's decision
Tags
intestate successionchildren born out of wedlockreview application
legislation
Statutes Cited
Administration of Estates Act
Deceased Estates Succession Act
High Court Act
Constitution of Zimbabwe
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the application for review was filed within the statutory 30-day period","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Master's decision made 15 July 2007, application filed thereafter"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant was required to serve the beneficiaries affected by the review","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"13 children born out of wedlock affected by review"}
{"issue_text":"Whether children born out of wedlock are entitled to inherit under intestate succession","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Common law position vs constitutional rights"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, widow of Tom Peterkin Mayisva, sought review of the Master's decision to include 13 children born out of wedlock as equal heirs to her late husband's estate. The Master had ruled that all 18 children (5 from the marriage, 9 from two long-term adulterous relationships, and 4 from other relationships) were entitled to inherit equally under intestate succession.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases