Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Edward Buwu and Fani Lesley Buwu and Atrax Holdings Limited and Atrax Commodities (Pvt) Ltd and Atrax Milling (Pvt) Ltd and Atrax Petroleum (Pvt) Ltd and Ommland Investments (Pvt) Ltd and Foay Investments (Pvt) Ltd and Village Inn (Pvt) Ltd and Wintex Trading (Pvt) Ltd v Cecil Hondo Madondo N.O and Nokuthula Moyo N.O and Shepherd Chimutanda and Office for the Registration of Companies and Other Business Entities (Companies Office) and Master of the High Court

HH 660-23

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
8 December 2023
Citation
HH 660-23
Neutral Citation
[2023] ZWHH 660
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Manzunzu J
Full Bench
Manzunzu J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureCompany Law
Keywords
upliftment of barcondonationnotice of oppositionHigh Court Rulesprocedural compliance
Tags
upliftment of barcondonationprocedural application
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 2021
  • High Court (Commercial Division) Rules 2020
  • High Court (Commercial Division) Rules 2020
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the third respondent should be granted upliftment of the bar","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Late filing of notice of opposition, explanation for delay"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants brought a court application seeking declaratory orders. The 3rd respondent was served on 29 June 2023 and required to file notice of opposition within 10 days by 13 July 2023, but only filed on 26 July 2023, resulting in being barred. The 3rd respondent made an oral application for upliftment of the bar at the hearing.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →