Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Elton Hakata v Edias Gondo

HH 340-25

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
9 June 2025
Citation
HH 340-25
Neutral Citation
[2025] ZWHH 340
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
Foroma J
Full Bench
Foroma JDube JP
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureAppellate Practice
Keywords
Security for costsNotice of appealOrder 31 Rule 1(2)Point in limine
Tags
Magistrates Court Civil RulesAppeal procedureSecurity for costs
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Magistrates Court (Civil) Rules, 2019
  • Magistrates Court (Civil) Rules, 2019
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether failure to pay security for respondent's costs as required by Order 31 Rule 1(2)(b)(i) invalidates a notice of appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's failure to pay US$100 security for costs"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant filed a notice of appeal against a magistrates court decision but failed to pay the required security for respondent's costs of US$100 as mandated by Order 31 Rule 1(2)(b)(i) of the Magistrates Court (Civil) Rules, 2019. The respondent raised a point in limine challenging the validity of the appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →