{"issue_text":"Whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"20-year separation, no conjugal rights, plaintiff's loss of love"}
{"issue_text":"Whether it is fair and just to share matrimonial property as proposed by plaintiff","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property acquisitions, contributions, current usage"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties were married under the Marriage Act in 1985 and had 5 children. After 16 years of marriage, the plaintiff instituted divorce proceedings in 2011, having deserted the matrimonial home in 1998. The marriage had irretrievably broken down with 20 years of separation and no conjugal relationship. The defendant opposed the divorce and sought extensive matrimonial property distribution.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases