Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No 20) Act 2013
Administrative Justice Act
Administrative Justice Act
Judicial Services Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the court had jurisdiction to issue a mandamus against the President","issue_type":"procedural/constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"President's executive function in removing judge, s 187 constitutional provisions"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant was entitled to costs against any respondents","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Matter settled out of court, applicant persisted with costs application"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a High Court judge, was removed from office by the President following a tribunal recommendation. She sought a mandamus compelling respondents to provide the decision and reasons for her removal, claiming breach of her right to administrative justice under s 68 of the Constitution.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases