{"issue_text":"Whether the appeal had become moot due to Tribunal establishment and appellant's removal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Tribunal established and concluded proceedings; appellant removed from office"}
{"issue_text":"Whether JSC was required to follow Code of Ethics before referring matter to President under s 187(3)","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"JSC proceeded directly to constitutional provision without Code of Ethics process"}
{"issue_text":"Whether court should exercise discretion to hear moot appeal in interests of justice","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant sought declaratory relief; matter involved important constitutional questions"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, a former High Court judge, appealed against the dismissal of her urgent application to interdict the President from establishing a Tribunal to investigate her removal from office. The Tribunal was established and she was removed before the appeal was heard.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases