Constitutional LawAdministrative LawJudicial Service Commission powers
Keywords
Section 187 ConstitutionJudicial removalCode of EthicsDisciplinary procedureIndependence of judiciary
Tags
Judicial disciplineConstitutional interpretationSeparation of powers
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
Constitution of Zimbabwe
High Court Act
Judicial Service Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Judicial Service Commission must follow Code of Ethics disciplinary procedure before referring a judge's removal to the President under s 187(3) of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"JSC resolved to refer removal without prior disciplinary committee; applicant argues this violates her right to administrative justice and judicial independence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant established a prima facie right to interim interdict","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant sought to halt referral pending determination of legality"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
A High Court judge sought an urgent interim interdict to stop the Judicial Service Commission from referring the question of her removal to the President under s 187(3) of the Constitution, arguing that the Code of Ethics procedure must first be followed. The JSC had resolved to refer her for alleged gross misconduct without prior disciplinary committee proceedings.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases