{"issue_text":"Whether applicant entitled to interdict preventing respondent from occupying matrimonial home","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Consent order terms, respondent's occupation, potential prejudice"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Former spouses where consent order granted applicant occupation of matrimonial home until minor child turned 18. Respondent attempted to re-occupy property during applicant's absence abroad, prompting urgent interdict application.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases