{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent's representative was properly authorized","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Tirivafi Engelberth Chiwunze deposed to opposing affidavit without board resolution"}
{"issue_text":"Whether a designated agent's determination can be registered for enforcement under s 128(1) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Determination made by designated agent MaryGrace Chikomwe, not labour officer"}
{"issue_text":"Whether s 92B(3) of the Labour Act applies to designated agent determinations","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant sought registration under this provision"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought registration of a designated agent ruling awarding him monetary benefits and reinstatement after unfair dismissal. The respondent opposed but its representative lacked authorization. The court found no statutory basis to register a designated agent's determination.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases