{"issue_text":"Whether the Chawatama determination was an award capable of being set aside under Art 34","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Determination terminated proceedings; made under Art 32 not Art 16"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court has jurisdiction to set aside the determination","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondents argued it was a ruling not award"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the determination violated public policy of Zimbabwe","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Based on non-existent award; breach of natural justice"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to set aside an arbitral determination by Regis Chawatama dated 15 April 2024, which terminated arbitration proceedings based on res judicata due to a prior Bere award. The Bere award had subsequently been set aside by the court on 11 April 2024, but the respondents failed to inform the arbitrator of this fact.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases