{"issue_text":"Whether Chawatama determination was an award capable of being set aside under Art 34","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Chawatama proceeded under Art 32, terminated proceedings finally"}
{"issue_text":"Whether court has jurisdiction to set aside Chawatama determination","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Determination made under Art 32 not Art 16"}
{"issue_text":"Whether Chawatama determination violated public policy","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Based on non-existent award, left applicant without recourse"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to set aside an arbitral determination by Regis Chawatama that terminated arbitration proceedings based on res judicata, claiming the determination was induced by fraud and violated natural justice. The respondents opposed, arguing the determination was a ruling not subject to Art 34 setting aside provisions.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases