Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Falcon Gold Zimbabwe Limited and Inyamazane Gold (Pvt) Limited v Fisani Moyo and 12 Others

HH 602-23

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
6 November 2023
Citation
HH 602-23
Neutral Citation
[2023] ZWHH 602
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
ZHOU J
Full Bench
ZHOU J
Areas of Law
Mining lawInterdictsCivil procedure
Keywords
Mining claimsInterdict pendente liteSupreme Court judgmentOre removalAntelope claims
Tags
Mining claimsInterdictUrgent applicationInterlocutory relief
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 2021
  • High Court Rules, 2021
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the application meets the requirements for urgency","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Discovery of mining on 8 October 2023, Supreme Court judgment 29 September 2023"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the relief sought is final or interlocutory","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Main action pending under HC 6672/23"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there was material non-disclosure of facts","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Previous litigation between parties"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there are material disputes of fact requiring oral evidence","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Alleged boundary disputes"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicants have established a clear or prima facie right","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Supreme Court judgment reinstating claims"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether there is well-grounded apprehension of irreparable harm","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Finite nature of mineral resources"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether balance of convenience favours granting interdict","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Irreversible loss of minerals vs temporary delay in extraction"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicants sought an urgent interdict to prevent the first to tenth respondents from mining ore and removing minerals from disputed mining claims in Maphisa, Kezi. The dispute arose after a Supreme Court judgment (SC 398/22) set aside the cancellation of the applicants' mining claims, reinstating their rights to the Antelope claims.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →