Bill of costsTaxationUnited States dollarsLegal tenderStatutory instruments
Tags
Taxation of costsReview proceedingsCurrency denomination
legislation
Statutes Cited
Legal Practitioners Act
Exchange Control Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether a bill of costs taxed in United States dollars after S.I. 142 of 2019 is lawful","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Bill taxed on 8 July 2019; S.I. 142 published 24 June 2019"}
{"issue_text":"Whether parties can consent to denomination in foreign currency contrary to law","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Second respondent claimed applicant consented to USD denomination"}
{"issue_text":"Whether costs for services of non-registered legal advisers are recoverable","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Second respondent paid T.S. Labour Specialists for legal advice"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought review of a bill of costs taxed in United States dollars, arguing this was unlawful after S.I. 142 of 2019 made the local currency sole legal tender. The second respondent claimed parties had agreed to the USD denomination.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases