{"issue_text":"Whether the matter is res judicata based on the previous judgment in HC 4673/05","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Previous judgment by GOWORA J declared the sale agreement void"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the illegal portion of the transaction can be severed from the legal portion","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Three agreements with different prices, only one declared void by GOWORA J"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought to enforce a property sale agreement involving three contracts with different prices intended to evade capital gains tax. A previous judgment by GOWORA J had declared the transaction illegal and void. The applicants argued the court should sever the illegal portion and enforce the legitimate part.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases