Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

FARAYI JAMES MABASHA v PAMELA GAZI

HH 656-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
27 September 2017
Citation
HH 656-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 656
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
MWAYERA J
Full Bench
MWAYERA JMUNANGATI-MANONGWA J
Areas of Law
Family LawChildren's Rights
Keywords
Access rightsMinor childOut of wedlockBest interestsSupervised access
Tags
Child access rightsChildren born out of wedlockBest interests of the child
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe
  • Children's Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the magistrate erred in granting vague \"reasonable access\" without specific timeframes","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Child's age, parties' acrimonious relationship, need for meaningful relationship"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether supervised access in respondent's presence was appropriate","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Child's young age, evidence of bad blood between parties"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether automatic custody to mother of child born out of wedlock is discriminatory","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Section 56 of Constitution, appellant's argument about discrimination"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The appellant and respondent sired a child out of wedlock on 21 June 2013. The appellant sought access rights from the magistrate's court, which granted reasonable access during weekends in the respondent's presence. Dissatisfied with the vague order, the appellant appealed to the High Court.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →