{"issue_text":"Whether stand number 1217 in Budiriro is a matrimonial asset belonging to both spouses","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property acquired during marriage but registered in husband's name only; husband's mother lived there"}
{"issue_text":"Whether Budiriro property should be awarded to the defendant","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Husband's sentimental attachment; mother's long residence"}
{"issue_text":"Whether both properties should be sold and proceeds shared equally","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Wife's request for 50-50 division; husband's opposition"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The parties married in 1989 and had four children. Upon divorce, they disputed division of two properties: a Budiriro house registered in husband's name which he claimed was for his mother, and a Marlborough matrimonial home registered in both names. Wife sought 50% of both properties.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases