Section 120 Administration of Estates ActEstate property saleMaster's consentPrivate treaty
Tags
Specific performanceEstate propertyAgreement of sale
legislation
Statutes Cited
Administration of Estates Act
High Court Rules, 1971
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the sale agreement was valid given that it preceded the section 120 authority","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Agreement signed 21 September 2016, authority granted 2 November 2016"}
{"issue_text":"Whether non-compliance with Order 32 rule 248(1) renders the application fatally defective","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Application not served on Master"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Applicant sought specific performance of an agreement of sale for immovable property (house number 1046 Chinotimba Township, Victoria Falls) signed with first respondent on 21 September 2016. The property was estate property. First respondent opposed the application, arguing the sale was invalid as it preceded the required Master's consent under section 120 of the Administration of Estates Act.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases