lease agreementbreachcostslegal practitioner and client scale
Tags
lease agreementbreach of contractcosts
legislation
Statutes Cited
N
o
n
e
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
i
e
d
-
n
o
s
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
p
r
o
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
w
e
r
e
c
i
t
e
d
o
r
a
p
p
l
i
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
j
u
d
g
m
e
n
t
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff is entitled to costs on legal practitioner and client scale","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The lease agreement contains clause 34.14 providing for such costs; the plaintiff conceded half its claim during settlement"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff landlord sued the defendant tenant and sureties for breach of a lease agreement for non-payment of rent and operating costs. The parties settled the liability aspect but could not agree on costs, requiring the court to determine the appropriate costs order.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases