Frances Mary Bowers and Bernadette Rose Costas N.O. (In her capacity as executrix dative of the estate of the late Vernon Reuben Bowers) v Minister of Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Settlement and 7 Others
Land reform programmeSection 16B ConstitutionIndigenous ZimbabweansAgricultural land acquisitionOuster clauseJurisdiction
Tags
Land reformAgricultural land acquisitionConstitutional challengeIndigenous ownership
legislation
Statutes Cited
P
o
l
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
4
R
e
g
u
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
o
r
y
P
o
w
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
6
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
a
n
d
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
3
S
e
r
i
o
u
s
O
r
g
a
n
i
s
e
d
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
P
o
l
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
T
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
6
P
r
o
c
e
e
d
s
o
f
C
r
i
m
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
2
M
i
s
u
s
e
o
f
D
r
u
g
s
A
c
t
1
9
7
1
T
h
e
f
t
A
c
t
1
9
6
8
F
r
a
u
d
A
c
t
2
0
0
6
S
e
r
i
o
u
s
C
r
i
m
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
A
t
t
e
m
p
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
L
a
w
A
c
t
1
9
7
7
A
c
c
e
s
s
o
r
i
e
s
a
n
d
A
b
e
t
t
o
r
s
A
c
t
1
8
6
1
P
o
l
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
6
P
o
l
i
c
e
R
e
f
o
r
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
2
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
P
o
l
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
(
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
C
o
-
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
0
D
r
u
g
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
k
i
n
g
A
c
t
1
9
9
4
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
D
i
s
o
r
d
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
Y
o
u
t
h
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
9
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
A
n
t
i
-
t
e
r
r
o
r
i
s
m
,
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
S
e
c
u
r
i
t
y
A
c
t
2
0
0
1
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
7
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
8
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
P
u
b
l
i
c
O
r
d
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
9
4
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
E
v
i
d
e
n
c
e
(
W
i
t
n
e
s
s
A
n
o
n
y
m
i
t
y
)
A
c
t
2
0
0
8
C
o
r
o
n
e
r
s
a
n
d
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
2
0
0
9
L
e
g
a
l
A
i
d
,
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
u
n
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
o
f
O
f
f
e
n
d
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
2
C
r
i
m
e
a
n
d
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
3
S
e
r
i
o
u
s
C
r
i
m
e
A
c
t
2
0
1
5
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
o
r
y
P
o
w
e
r
s
A
c
t
2
0
1
6
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the Court has jurisdiction to determine the application?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Constitutional ouster clause in s16B(3), applicants' challenge based on indigenous status"}
{"issue_text":"Whether subdivision J and K of Mnyami Farm was procedurally acquired given applicants are indigenous Zimbabweans?","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Acquisition process followed, applicants' indigenous status"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants, indigenous Zimbabweans, sought delisting of their farm acquired by government in 2005 and eviction of occupiers, arguing acquisition was erroneous as it involved indigenous-owned land. The Land Commission had recommended delisting and withdrawal of offer letters to occupiers, but government failed to implement this.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases