{"issue_text":"What is the proper date for calculating delictual damages - date of delict (November 2001) or date of award (September 2004)?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Property sold November 2001, award made September 2004"}
{"issue_text":"Is the arbitrator's award so grossly unreasonable as to constitute a palpable inequity contrary to public policy?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award of $4.8 million plus interest, interest rate and commencement date"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant purchased a stand from the 1st respondent in December 2000, but the 1st respondent later sold the same property to the 2nd respondent in November 2001, claiming the first agreement had lapsed. The dispute was referred to arbitration where the arbitrator awarded the applicant $4.8 million as damages rather than ordering property transfer, finding the 2nd respondent was a bona fide purchaser who had made significant improvements.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases