Fixed term contractsLegitimate expectationReplacementSection 12B(3)Labour Act
Tags
Fixed term contractsContract renewalReplacement employees
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether engaging a private security company to provide services constitutes \"replacement\" under section 12B(3) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent engaged private security company after appellants' contracts expired; 18 security guards were among appellants"}
{"issue_text":"Whether job advertisements placed three months after contract expiry constitute evidence of replacement under section 12B(3)","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Advertisements placed in March 2014 for contracts that expired July-December 2013; adverts covered only 3 positions while 35 employees (excluding security guards) were involved"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellants, who were employed by the respondent on fixed term contracts, had their contracts expire between July and December 2013 without renewal. They claimed unfair dismissal under section 12B(3) of the Labour Act, arguing they had legitimate expectation of renewal and were replaced. The arbitrator dismissed their complaint, finding no replacement by natural persons occurred.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases