Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Gift Nyemba and William Brown v Enterprise Dog Handler Unit

LC/H/288/2016

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
25 February 2016
Citation
LC/H/288/2016
Neutral Citation
[2016] ZWLC 288
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
L. Hove
Full Bench
L. Hove
Areas of Law
Labour lawEmployment contractsCollective bargaining
Keywords
overtimeworks counciltime off compensationstatutory instrument 45/93
Tags
overtime compensationworks council agreementtime off in lieu
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the works council agreement compensating overtime with time off violates section 6(1) of the Labour Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"252-hour monthly work schedule, 208-hour statutory maximum"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether section 7(2)(b) of SI 45/93 permits overtime compensation through time off","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Mutual agreement for 9 days off after 21 working days"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the agreement required registration to be binding","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Agreement operated unregistered from 2005"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Former employees claimed overtime pay for working 252 hours monthly instead of statutory 208 hours. A 2005 works council agreement provided compensation through 9 days off after every 21 working days instead of overtime pay.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →