Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

Glenulas Trading (Pvt) Ltd t/a Sitatunga Zimbabwe v Tsholotsho Rural District Council & 2 Ors

HB 157-19

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
17 October 2019
Citation
HB 157-19
Neutral Citation
[2019] ZWHB 157
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
Takuva J
Full Bench
Takuva J
Areas of Law
Administrative LawPublic Procurement Law
Keywords
interdictprocurementtender processsafari operationshunting concession
Tags
procurementtenderinterdictsafari operations
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act
  • Rural District Councils Act
  • Parks and Wildlife Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has established the requisites for an interdict","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's loss in tender, contract between 1st and 2nd respondents"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has a prima facie right to the relief sought","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's unsuccessful bid, 2nd respondent's successful bid"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, a safari operator, sought an interdict to prevent the 2nd respondent from conducting hunting operations in the Tsholotsho North Hunting Concession Area. The applicant alleged that the 1st and 2nd respondents contracted outside the prescripts of procurement law after a tender process that was later reviewed by the 3rd respondent's Review Panel.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →