{"issue_text":"Whether applicants are entitled to condonation for late filing of notice of appeal","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Notice submitted 17 January 2023, deadline expired 6 January 2023"}
{"issue_text":"Whether application is premised on a falsehood regarding timeous filing","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Claims of January filing vs IECMS showing 17 January submission"}
{"issue_text":"Whether making payment while challenging judgment constitutes approbation and reprobation","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"ZW$45 million payment on 8 February 2023"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants sought condonation for late filing of a notice of appeal against dismissal of their rescission application. They claimed the IECMS system failed to process their timeous filing, but records showed the notice was filed 12 days late. The court found the application was premised on a falsehood and struck it off the roll with costs.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases