arbitral awardpublic policynatural justicearbitrationsetting aside award
Tags
arbitrationarbitral awardpublic policy
legislation
Statutes Cited
Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award should be set aside for being in conflict with public policy of Zimbabwe","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator's determination of issues, application of exchange rates, award of remedies"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator determined issues not placed before him","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Claim for realised proceeds, amendment of claims"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there was breach of natural justice","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Introduction of new claims, opportunity to defend"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to set aside an arbitral award issued by the second respondent arbitrator on 16 August 2010, alleging it conflicted with Zimbabwe's public policy. The applicant claimed the arbitrator determined issues not placed before him, breached natural justice rules, and acted contrary to substantive law.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases