Locus standiAssociationPartnershipProfessional servicesOrder 2A
Tags
Professional servicesContractual disputeLocus standi
legislation
Statutes Cited
High Court Rules, 1971
Rule 7: “‘association’ includes — (a) a trust; and (b) a partnership, a syndicate, a club or any other association of persons which is not a body corporate.”
Rule 8: “Subject to this Order, associates may sue and be sued in the name of their association.”
Rule 8C: “Subject to this Order, a person carrying on business in a name or style other than his own name may sue or be sued in that name or style as if it were the name of an association …”
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff has locus standi in judicio to institute action under Order 2A of the High Court Rules","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff styled itself as a team; plaintiff had been operating since 2002"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff, a consortium of design and engineering companies, sued the defendant University of Zimbabwe for US$1,824,478.80 for professional services rendered over a 10-year period from 2002 to 2012. The defendant raised a point in limine challenging the plaintiff's locus standi, arguing the plaintiff was neither an association nor a partnership and therefore could not institute action under Order 2A of the High Court Rules.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases