Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

Grain Marketing Board v Arenel (Pvt) Ltd and Gordon Geddes N.O.

HB 156-20

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
23 July 2020
Citation
HB 156-20
Neutral Citation
[2020] ZWHB 156
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Dube-Banda J
Full Bench
Dube-Banda J
Areas of Law
Arbitration lawCommercial lawPublic policy
Keywords
Arbitral awardSetting asidePublic policySpecific performanceSeverability
Tags
ArbitrationCommercial disputePublic policy
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Arbitration Act
  • Arbitration Act
  • Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Did the arbitrator fail to decide on the pertinent issue of whether contract provisions were severable due to unreasonable pricing?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contract price RTGS$1,135 vs market price RTGS$9,162; GMB public entity status"}
  • {"issue_text":"Is the alternative relief in the arbitral award vague and embarrassing and contrary to public policy?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alternative order to pay unnamed supplier"}
  • {"issue_text":"Should the arbitral award be registered as an order of court?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Award grants specific performance"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The Grain Marketing Board (GMB) and Arenel (Pvt) Ltd entered into an agreement for supply of 6000 metric tonnes of biscuit flour. A dispute arose when GMB failed to supply the full quantity. Arbitration ensued and the arbitrator ordered specific performance. GMB applied to set aside the award on public policy grounds while Arenel sought registration of the award.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →