Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

Grow Even Syndicate v Robson Sibanda & Anor & Anor

HB 58/21

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
30 March 2021
Citation
HB 58/21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHB 58
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Dube-Banda J
Full Bench
Dube-Banda J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureMining Law
Keywords
rescissionrule 449functus officioprovisional ordermistake common to parties
Tags
rescissionrule 449provisional orderurgent application
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • G
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 2
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • G
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 4
  • L
  • o
  • c
  • a
  • l
  • G
  • o
  • v
  • e
  • r
  • n
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • H
  • o
  • u
  • s
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 9
  • P
  • a
  • r
  • l
  • i
  • a
  • m
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • a
  • r
  • y
  • C
  • o
  • m
  • m
  • i
  • s
  • s
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • e
  • r
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 7
  • R
  • a
  • c
  • i
  • a
  • l
  • R
  • e
  • l
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 6
  • S
  • e
  • x
  • D
  • i
  • s
  • c
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 7
  • 5
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • S
  • u
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court should rescind its order of 11 March 2021 mero motu under rule 449","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The court mistakenly believed the matter was opposed when both counsel confirmed it was not"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought rescission of an order made on 11 March 2021 where the court had incorrectly concluded that the matter was opposed and removed it from the unopposed motion court roll. The court had mistakenly believed the notice of opposition related to confirmation of the provisional order rather than its initial granting.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →