{"issue_text":"Whether Hwange Colliery entitled to remove Fred Moyo from bank signatories","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Fred Moyo dismissed from Hwange Colliery, remained signatory"}
{"issue_text":"Whether all three signatories required for bank withdrawals","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Consent order allowed any two to sign"}
{"issue_text":"Whether anti-dissipation interdict should be granted","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Assets include coke oven and coal stocks"}
{"issue_text":"Whether Savanhu should be interdicted from representing company","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Savanhu dismissed from Hwange Colliery but remained director"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Multiple urgent applications concerning control of Hwange Coal Gasification Company between warring factions of shareholders, with disputes over bank account access, director appointments, and asset protection.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases