absolution from the instancelocus standicompany resolutioncontract existenceforeign currency claims
Tags
contract disputeabsolution from the instancecompany representation
legislation
Statutes Cited
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
1
9
7
4
S
u
p
r
e
m
e
C
o
u
r
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
S
e
n
i
o
r
C
o
u
r
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
C
i
v
i
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
R
u
l
e
s
1
9
9
8
T
r
i
b
u
n
a
l
s
,
C
o
u
r
t
s
a
n
d
E
n
f
o
r
c
e
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
2
0
0
7
C
o
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
f
o
r
m
A
c
t
2
0
0
5
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
H
o
u
s
i
n
g
A
c
t
1
9
8
9
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
8
8
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
L
a
n
d
A
c
t
1
9
8
0
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
,
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
L
a
n
d
A
c
t
1
9
8
0
L
o
c
a
l
i
s
m
A
c
t
2
0
1
1
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
2
0
0
0
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
1
9
9
9
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
8
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
5
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
1
9
7
2
L
o
c
a
l
G
o
v
e
r
n
m
e
n
t
A
c
t
1
9
5
8
P
u
b
l
i
c
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
O
m
b
u
d
s
m
a
n
A
c
t
2
0
2
2
O
m
b
u
d
s
m
a
n
A
c
t
1
9
6
7
P
a
r
l
i
a
m
e
n
t
a
r
y
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
e
r
A
c
t
1
9
6
7
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
v
e
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
a
n
d
T
r
i
b
u
n
a
l
s
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
A
c
t
2
0
0
7
T
r
i
b
u
n
a
l
s
a
n
d
I
n
q
u
i
r
i
e
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
2
T
r
i
b
u
n
a
l
s
a
n
d
I
n
q
u
i
r
i
e
s
A
c
t
1
9
5
8
S
t
a
t
u
t
o
r
y
I
n
s
t
r
u
m
e
n
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
4
6
I
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
a
t
i
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
7
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
A
c
t
1
9
7
2
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
U
n
i
o
n
(
W
i
t
h
d
r
a
w
a
l
)
A
c
t
2
0
1
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
U
n
i
o
n
(
W
i
t
h
d
r
a
w
a
l
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
2
0
B
r
e
x
i
t
(
W
i
t
h
d
r
a
w
a
l
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
)
A
c
t
2
0
2
0
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
2
0
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
2
1
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
2
2
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
2
3
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
2
4
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
2
5
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
2
6
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
2
7
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
2
8
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
2
9
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
3
0
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
3
1
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
3
2
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
3
3
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
3
4
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
3
5
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
3
6
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
3
7
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
3
8
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
3
9
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
4
0
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
4
1
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
4
2
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
4
3
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
4
4
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
4
5
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
4
6
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
4
7
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
4
8
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
4
9
U
n
i
t
e
d
K
i
n
g
d
o
m
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
M
a
r
k
e
t
A
c
t
2
0
5
0
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant had locus standi to institute proceedings without company resolution","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Mr Angel represented company without authorization"}
{"issue_text":"Whether grounds of appeal complied with requirements of clarity and conciseness","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Ground 1 contained 18 paragraphs over 3 pages"}
{"issue_text":"Whether prayer sought was competent","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Prayer sought judgment at close of plaintiff's case"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant company claimed payment for computer services rendered to Runyararo Primary School. The Magistrates Court granted absolution from the instance due to failure to prove contract existence. The appeal was struck off for procedural defects including lack of company resolution authorizing litigation and incomprehensible grounds of appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases