{"issue_text":"Whether Mugwara had authority to issue the two guarantees","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Mugwara's position as Head of Short Term Loans Unit; his job description; bank's internal procedures"}
{"issue_text":"Whether appellant was liable based on ostensible authority","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Mugwara's conduct and representations; respondent's reliance"}
{"issue_text":"Whether Turquand Rule applied despite s 30 of IDBZ Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant is statutory corporation; s 30 excludes Companies Act application"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, a statutory corporation, issued two guarantees totaling US$950,000 for Wedzera Petroleum's fuel purchases from respondent. When Wedzera failed to pay, respondent claimed payment from appellant. Appellant denied liability claiming the guarantees were fraudulently issued by an unauthorized employee.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases