{"issue_text":"Whether applicant has made out a good case for reinstatement of the abandoned matter","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Application filed 5 months late, previous application deemed abandoned"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has a reasonably arguable case on the merits of the intended review","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant claims appeal should have been heard by Finance Director not CEO"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant employee, who was dismissed by the 2nd respondent, sought reinstatement of his review application which had been deemed abandoned for failure to file heads of argument on time. He claimed his disciplinary appeal should have been heard by the Finance Director rather than the CEO.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases