Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Interfin Banking Corporation Limited (under curatorship) v Veanarcy (Private) Limited

HH 388-13

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
1 November 2013
Citation
HH 388-13
Neutral Citation
[2013] ZWHH 388
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Mafusire J
Full Bench
Mafusire J
Areas of Law
Banking LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
provisional sentenceliquid documentloan facilitymortgage bondacknowledgment of debt
Tags
provisional sentenceliquid documentbankingloan agreement
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, Order 4 (Provisional Sentence)
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff is entitled to provisional sentence based on liquid documents","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff holds liquid documents acknowledging the debt"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the defendants have shown sufficient cause to resist provisional sentence","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendants raised cession and counterclaim defenses"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff bank claimed provisional sentence against the defendant company for US$142,672-01 arising from a loan facility agreement. The defendants opposed on grounds that the claim had been ceded to another entity and that they had a counterclaim for rental damages exceeding the plaintiff's claim.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →