Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Labour Court

Ishmael Mushanguri & 20 Others v Zimbabwe Power Company

[2014] ZWLC 99

Case Details

Court
Labour Court
Date
28 February 2014
Citation
[2014] ZWLC 99
Judgment No.
LC/H/99/2014
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Appeal

Bench

Presiding
L.M. Murasi
Full Bench
L.M. Murasi
Areas of Law
Labour lawEmployment contracts
Keywords
fixed term contractslegitimate expectationcontract renewalarbitrator's findings
Tags
fixed term contractscontract renewallegitimate expectation
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Labour Act
  • Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator erred in finding that Appellants had no legitimate expectation to be re-engaged","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Past renewal of contracts, production of replacement workers list"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator failed to properly consider claims for housing allowances and non-pensionable allowances","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arbitrator's award did not specifically address these claims"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the appeal was properly before the Court as it raised points of law rather than factual disputes","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Respondent raised point in limine"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

Appellants were employed on fixed term contracts which were periodically renewed by the Respondent. When these contracts were not subsequently renewed, they commenced litigation up to arbitration. The Arbitrator ruled in favour of the Respondent, prompting this appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →